Former immigration minister Robert Jenrick has criticized the draft law to revive the Rwanda asylum scheme, arguing that it is weak and will face legal challenges. In an interview, Jenrick expressed his skepticism about the bill, stating that it currently lacks the necessary provisions to effectively deter individuals from making dangerous crossings across the English Channel. In fact, he even resigned from his position as immigration minister because he felt unable to support a bill that he deemed ineffective.
However, the bill has not only sparked controversy within the Conservative Party but has also divided opinions among MPs. Their support will prove crucial for the bill’s passage in Parliament. Nonetheless, Housing and Communities Secretary Michael Gove has stepped forward to defend the legislation, stating that it is legally sound and only allows a small number of appeals.
Internally, different factions within the Tory party have sought legal advice on the bill and are expected to deliver their verdict before the crucial Tuesday vote. Meanwhile, opposition parties, including Labour, have already expressed their intent to vote against the bill.
Jenrick has warned his fellow Conservatives that they will face severe voter backlash unless they take stronger action to deal with legal and illegal migration. In response to growing concerns within the party, the government has recently unveiled measures aimed at reducing legal migration.
Interestingly, even Labour has shown support for the government’s decision to raise the minimum salary for a UK work visa, highlighting the level of agreement regarding the need for more stringent immigration policies.
It remains to be seen how the bill will fare in the upcoming vote, but it is clear that the issue of immigration continues to be a contentious one within British politics. With key figures like Jenrick voicing their doubts and opposition parties eager to block its passage, the future of the bill hangs in the balance.
“Prone to fits of apathy. Devoted music geek. Troublemaker. Typical analyst. Alcohol practitioner. Food junkie. Passionate tv fan. Web expert.”