American Foreign Policy Goes Horribly Wrong As Tehran Seizes Control Of Baghdad

in World by

Confusion is a powerful tool. Per media reports that revealed that the Iraqi federal government began operations to take control over the region of Iraqi Kurdistan, a lot of confusion still looms.

Within the Beltway, people are lost and questioning whether or not the Trump Administration made the best decision to partake in a stance of neutrality in the Iraqi-Kurd dispute. However, the only thing that can be taken seriously is the fact that many in the international community—including President Donald Trump and the leadership of the United Nations—are non-committal to either side. But, something suggests otherwise.

Never mind this concern, though. As the situation on the ground plays out, it is becoming more evident that Iraq and Iran are coordinating to maintain a regional hegemonic control over people who are due their liberty to live without interference from secular and theocratic autocracies.

Reports have arisen that Iraqi forces coordinated with Iranian forces over the invasion of Kirkuk. Ultimately, this signals to the many who want a peaceful resolution to the Kurdish independence row that the Revolutionary Guard has seduced Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.

Compounding the crisis, Trump’s neutrality has pushed the Iraqi federal government into the arms of the Iranians. And, naturally, the match fits as both the Abadi government in Baghdad and Tehran’s theocratic dictatorship have a common problem: the Kurds.

Federal forces stormed into Kirkuk with the intention to exercise power over the independence referendum—that the Kurds overwhelmingly supported—introduced by Massoud Barzani. But, several state-backed Shiite militias, which have sworn allegiance or affiliation in some degree to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, joined in the violent fun—with federal forces.

The reason? Tehran has finally made its play to exert more influence over Iraq to fill the significant gap of power left by the waning elements of American influence.

An Iraqi-Iranian Shiite alliance is on the rise within the region, and it is incumbent upon the United States to finally make their position on the Kurdish independence issue known.

Yes, the State Department publicly denounced the referendum. Several UN powers are in opposition to a free Kurdistan. However, the crisis here is the fact that Iran views this opportunity as an exploitative one. Exploitative in the sense that America’s debt to the Kurds is a weakness that will be taken advantage of.

Thus, Trump’s neutral stance and the alignment between Baghdad and Tehran could be the diplomatic climate needed to spark a civil war between factions that once served side-by-side against the scourge of Islamic State—with the backing of the American military.

In the end, the only narrative that comes from this is one of irony. When he entered the office he occupies, President Trump swore to stomp out Iran’s meddling in the more significant status quo of the Middle East. He blew his chance here.

The other element of irony at play is the fact that the current Iraqi military has received training and equipment almost exclusively from the United States’ taxpayers. Given this fact, there is a high probability that the United States, indirectly, armed the Iraqi military and the backed Iranian militias at their side to harm and assert a provocative action against the Kurds. So, let’s just hope that the headlines in the coming weeks don’t highlight the deaths of Kurdish women and children at the hands of Iraqi troops sporting machine guns paid for by the American people.

Based on these ramblings, the key takeaway is that the Iraqi-Kurd dispute is a complex geopolitical crisis that was spurred by Iran’s ambitions to control the Middle East.

In the latest display of this ambition, it is becoming more and more evident that Tehran has a level of control over Baghdad that the United States once had. Now, the U.S. is demoted to a minor player’s status in this game as countrymen fight amongst each other.

Is Kurdish independence worth the break out of a civil war? Yeah, it sure looks like it given the realities that the Kurds have no friends in this game of self-defense.

With nations like Iran now flexing their muscles, American influence in the Middle East can be further downgraded. No matter what the outcome of this dispute is, all the cards remain in the hands of the Iranians as they prepare to become the next center of Islamic power.

Michael McGrady is the executive director of McGrady Policy Research. His work has been featured, republished and/or cited by media outlets like The Wall Street Journal, The Denver Post, The New York Post, The Daily Caller, Human Events, The Hill, and many others.

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest from World

Wait! Before you leave, share this article!

Share this article!

Go to Top

Like and follow us on social media!