Sage Steele, a former ESPN host, has recently voiced her criticism of Rev. Al Sharpton for defending Claudine Gay, who announced her resignation as president of Harvard University. In an article published on ‘The Liberty Conservative,’ Steele expressed her frustration with Sharpton’s claim to know what every person of color thinks, believes, and how they should live, act, and vote.
Steele disagreed with Sharpton’s characterization of Gay’s resignation as an “attack” on all black women. Instead, she argued that the criticism Gay faced was not because of her race, but rather related to issues revolving around her character. Steele pointed out concerns regarding Gay’s handling of antisemitism on campus and plagiarism accusations, which she deemed as legitimate reasons for scrutiny.
In her argument, Steele referenced the iconic message of Martin Luther King Jr., stating that individuals should be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. This principle, according to Steele, is at odds with Sharpton’s defense of Gay solely based on her race.
While Gay will step down as Harvard’s president, she will continue her work as a faculty member. Steele acknowledged that Harvard had condemned racist attacks against Gay, but raised questions about Gay’s response to queries concerning antisemitic comments on campus. Steele claimed that Gay had refused to address these concerns, which further fueled the controversy surrounding her tenure as president.
Steele highlighted the importance of denouncing any form of racism but also emphasized the need to address concerns about Gay’s character and actions during her time as Harvard president. She argued that holding individuals accountable for their actions, regardless of their race, is essential for maintaining integrity and fairness in our society.
In a time when racial tensions are high, Steele’s critique of Sharpton’s defense of Claudine Gay adds a fresh perspective to the ongoing debate surrounding identity politics and the need to evaluate individuals based on their actions rather than their race.
“Infuriatingly humble tv expert. Friendly student. Travel fanatic. Bacon fan. Unable to type with boxing gloves on.”